Webinar - From Back Alley to the Border: Criminal Abortion in the 20th Century U.S. |
|
In this webinar, Dr. Alicia Gutierrez-Romine of California State University, San Bernardino, discusses U.S. constitutionalism and criminal abortion in the 20th century with Dr. William Thomas and his American Constitutional History class.
|
Webinar - The Carceral State: Legal Histories of American Unfreedom |
|
In this webinar, Professor Taja-Nia Henderson of Rutgers Law School discusses race, the carceral state, and the criminalization of Blackness with Professor Danielle Jefferis of the University of Nebraska College of Law and our And Justice For All class.
|
Webinar - The Insular Cases and Contested Citizenship |
|
In this webinar, Professor Robert McGreevey of the College of New Jersey discusses the intersection of U.S. colonial power and migration with Dr. Jeannette Eileen Jones and her And Justice For All class.
|
Webinar - U.S. Constitutionalism and Native American Sovereignty |
|
In this webinar, Professor Ned Blackhawk of Yale University discusses his recent book The Rediscovery of America: Native Peoples and the Unmaking of U.S. History, which argues for the centrality of Native people and their nations throughout American history from the colonial era to the present, as well as tribal sovereignty and federal Indian law in the United States.
|
Webinar - Vanguard: Black Women and the Right to Vote |
|
In this webinar, Professor Martha S. Jones of Johns Hopkins University discusses Black women and the right to vote with Dr. William Thomas and his American Constitutional History class.
|
Yasui v. United States |
|
In this case, the Supreme Court held that curfews against minority groups were constitutional at a time of war against the country that group's ancestors originated from. After the Executive Order 9066 was issued in the wake of the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were subject to curfews and other restrictions in addition to being removed to internment camps. Minoru Yasui was convicted of violating the curfew. This was a companion case to Hirabayashi v. United States, decided on the same day.
|