In the Matter of the Application of Gussie Burns for Writ of Habeas Corpus (1920)
In the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska.
Gussie Burns, Relator,
vs. 
Marshal Eberstein, Chief of Police, Dr. J. F. Edwards, Health Commissioner, and Alta Berger, Respondents.
Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Comes now the petitioner and shows to the Court that she is unlawfully deprived of her liberty by the Respondents:
The Relator further alleges and shows to the Court that on November 29, 1919, a complaint, copy of which is attached hereto, made a part hereof and marked Exhibit "A" was filed against her before the Police Magistrate of the City of Omaha, Nebraska, charging her with vagrancy; that relator was tried on said complaint before James M. Fitzgerald, police magistrate of the city of Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska, on said November 29, 1919, was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail of Douglas County for a period of thirty days; that immediately after said sentence was imposed, relator, who had been examined physically by certain officers under the direction and control of the Health Commissioner of the City of Omaha, and pronounced infected with a venereal disease, was confined in the detention home in the City of Omaha, wherein are detained women who are found, upon examination, to be infected with venereal diseases; that since said 29th day of November, 1919, relator has been and still is detained in said detention home, although the period of her sentence of 30 days has expired, and in spite of the further fact that she has so far responded to treatment as to indicate full recovery from the alleged infection.
That three or four times within the past year relator has been taken into custody and confined and detained in said detention home for women, under the pretext that she was suffering with a venereal infection, and each time after a certain period of confinement has been discharged as cured; that she was discharged from said home only a short time before her arrest on November 29, 1919, as aforesaid, and was at that time pronounced cured; that her condition at the period of her arrest and confinement on and since said November 29, 1919, was the same as when she was discharged from said detention home as cured, no condition having arisen during the interval to bring about a renewal of the alleged venereal infection.
Relator further alleges that respondents herein insist on her undergoing an operation for the removal of certain tubes as a condition precedent to her release, and that she is being detained and confined at this time, not because of an existing purulent venereal infection; that respondents insist on performing the said operation themselves, refusing to allow relator to have a physician selected by herself do the work; that relator is willing to have said operation performed, but desires that it be done by some physician of her own selection.
Relator further states that in view of the fact that the period of 30 days confinement to which she was sentenced has long since expired, and of the further fact that she is now cured of any venereal disease with which she may have been infected at the date of her arrest, and is being held only until she consents to have said operation performed, she is now and has been ever since said sentence of thirty days expired, entitled to her liberty, but is now and has been unjustly detained and imprisoned by said respondents, and wholly without authority of law.
Wherefore the relator prays that a writ of habeas corpus may be issued and that she may be discharged from said unlawful imprisonment.
W. E. Lovely
Attorney for Relator.
State of Nebraska
County of Douglas. ss
William E. Lovely, being first duly sworn, upon his oath deposes and says that he is attorney for the relator herein, that the facts herein alleged are within his personal knowledge and that the same are true.
W. E. Lovely
Subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me this 2nd day of March, 1920.
Jas M. Lovely,
Notary Public.
[Exhibit A]
State of Nebraska,
County of Douglas, City of Omaha, ss.
In the Police Court of the City of Omaha, Douglas County, Neb.
The State of Nebraska,
vs.
Gussie Burns
For Vagrancy.
The complaint and information of J. B. Murray, City Prosecutor, City of Omaha, Douglas County aforesaid, made in the name of the State of Nebraska before the Magistrate of the Police Court, within and for the City of Omaha, in said County, this Nov. 29, 1919 A.D., who, being duly sworn on his oath says that Gussie Burns Defendant on or about the 28 day of Nov. A.D., 1919, in the County aforesaid and within the incorporate limits of the City of Omaha aforesaid, then and there being, was then and there unlawfully an idle person, not having visible means of support and maintenance, and who live without employment and wander abroad and live in taverns, beer houses, sheds, barns, and open air, and cannot give a good account of himself, and is a suspicious character and is a vagrant, contrary to the ordinance of the City of Omaha and the form of the statutes in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Nebraska.
(signed) J. B. Murray
Subscribed in my presence and sworn to before more this Nov. 29, 1919 A.D.
(signed) Jas. M. Fitzgerald
Police Magistrate of the City of Omaha
Filed Nov. 29, 1919
Jas. M. Fitzgerald
Police Magistrate
30 days in County Jail
Nov. 29, 1919
S. M.
In the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska.
In the matter of the Application of Gussie Burns for a writ of Habeas Corpus.
22-221
Order.
Now, on this 2nd day of March, 1920, came Gussie Burns, by W. E. Lovely, her attorney, and presented his petition duly verified, praying for a writ of habeas corpus and produced to me a copy of the commitment by which the said Gussie Burns is deprived of her liberty, and it appearing from the allegations in said petition that the said Gussie Burns is unlawfully detained and imprisoned:
It is therefore ordered that a writ of habeas corpus be allowed to issue in favor of said Gussie Burns, returnable on the 4 day of Mar[ch], 1920, at 10 A.M. in Court Room No. 3 Douglas County Court House, and be directed to Alta Berger, superintendent of the women's detention home, 1015 Dodge Street, Omaha, Nebraska.
By the Court: 
Lee S. Estelle
Judge.
The State of Nebraska,
Douglas County, ss.
State of Nebraska, To Alta Berger, Superintendent, Women's Detention Home, Greeting:
We command you that the body of Gussie Burns imprisoned and restrained of his liberty by you, as it is said, you take and have before Hon. Chas. A. Goss, Judge of the District Court for said County, on the 4th day of March 1920, at 10 o'clock A.M. to do and receive what the said Judge shall then and there consider concerning him in his behalf, and have you then and there this writ with your doings hereon and show cause of the said taking and detaining of the said Gussie Burns.
Witness my hand and the seal of said Court, at Omaha, this 2nd day of March 1920.
Robert Smith, Clerk.
By Asel Steere Jr., Deputy.
- Title
- In the Matter of the Application of Gussie Burns for Writ of Habeas Corpus (1920)
- Description
- In this case, Gussie Burns was arrested for vagrancy, found guilty, and sentenced to 30 days in the county jail. After her sentencing, she was subjected to a physical examination and reportedly found to have venereal disease. As a result, she was sent to the Omaha Women's Detention Home for treatment. After being confined to the home for four months, Gussie petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that her 30 day sentence had long since passed, the disease she was alleged to have did not exist, and that officials would not release her until she consented to "an operation for the removal of certain tubes." A writ was granted, though the outcome of her case is unknown. Cases like Gussie's illustrate the legal sophistication of women in the face of attempts to subordinate them during the Progressive Era.
- Excerpted
- Yes
- Date
- 1920-03
- Temporal Coverage
- Jim Crow Era
- Exclusion Era
- Allotment and Assimilation Era
- Progressive Era
- Long Civil Rights Movement
- Prohibition Era
- Interwar Period
- Procedural History
- District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska
- Document Type
- Court Case
- Document Category
- Primary Source
- Archival Source
- RG 230, Douglas County Records, Subgroup 10, District Court, 1855-1972, Series 7, Criminal Case Files, 1897-1920, Reel 90, Doc. 22-211 to 22-358, Mar. 22, 1920 - Apr. 16, 1920, No. 22-221, Nebraska State Historical Society
- Digital Repository
- Petitioning for Freedom
- Title
- In the Matter of the Application of Gussie Burns for Writ of Habeas Corpus (1920)
- Description
- In this case, Gussie Burns was arrested for vagrancy, found guilty, and sentenced to 30 days in the county jail. After her sentencing, she was subjected to a physical examination and reportedly found to have venereal disease. As a result, she was sent to the Omaha Women's Detention Home for treatment. After being confined to the home for four months, Gussie petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that her 30 day sentence had long since passed, the disease she was alleged to have did not exist, and that officials would not release her until she consented to "an operation for the removal of certain tubes." A writ was granted, though the outcome of her case is unknown. Cases like Gussie's illustrate the legal sophistication of women in the face of attempts to subordinate them during the Progressive Era.
- Excerpted
- Yes
- Date
- 1920-03
- Temporal Coverage
- Jim Crow Era
- Exclusion Era
- Allotment and Assimilation Era
- Progressive Era
- Long Civil Rights Movement
- Prohibition Era
- Interwar Period
- Procedural History
- District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska
- Document Type
- Court Case
- Document Category
- Primary Source
- Archival Source
- RG 230, Douglas County Records, Subgroup 10, District Court, 1855-1972, Series 7, Criminal Case Files, 1897-1920, Reel 90, Doc. 22-211 to 22-358, Mar. 22, 1920 - Apr. 16, 1920, No. 22-221, Nebraska State Historical Society
- Digital Repository
- Petitioning for Freedom
